In a dissenting opinion, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes argued that the First Amendment protects the right to dissent from the government's viewpoints and objectives.
((( today, BIDEN VISITED THE UKRAINE ---- HENCE THIS IS A REALLY REALLY IMPORTANT DATE TO DEFEND
DEMOCRAZY CRAZY DEMOCRACY BUT IT IS A REAL CASE AND IT REPRESENTS 50 PERCENT *CHINA S ECONOMY
WANTS TO SIDE WITH THE DICTATURSHIP CALLED PUTIN AND ALREADY WE KNOW THAT china wants to be with
north KOREA hence my PERFORMANCE ... FINE ART PAINTING ETC.... THE DOWN JOHN DOWN 2 %
BOEM " kiev stands strong, kiev stands prou, kiev stands FREE "
PUTIN SAYS .... " PUTIN ... THREATENS TO LEAVE THE NUCLEAR ARMS CONTROL TREATY "
HENCE. AS WE KNOW.. SEE THIS WART WORK .. BELOW . .THIS PERFORMANCE TWO WARRIERS...
two samurais .. this is of course, a paitining performance that pushes on all endes.
nuclear war heards.. hence the korean name of the intercontinental missile and then me speaking japanese with the co-artist who made the
circular panting but i tried to dance, and i danced, i performed naked for the body sensitive parts of the most reactionary forces in the usa
and i performed or danced and created this work as an art work by rainer ganahl that left a painterly trail hence.. this is a painting performance
and blue reflects the yoga poses of ives klein and the samurai yves klein who had ladies naked on the canvas .. i am my own lady
i am happy taht my sex was not needed but i am autonomous and an artist who can perform, dance, think historically and write plus explain my work
and trade with the artist who worked on this performance with me .. and i extended my arms to him the young japanese artist who i invited
to do more wors with me in berlin .... as long as we survive it.
Biden ... note is the FIRST PEACE *war PRESIDENT OF THE USA .. bc i does not have us troups on the ground nor did US airplane
accompany him when he paid a visit to the WAR PRESIDENT UNDER ATTACK BY PUTIN S RUSSIA hence... He did not go to the war front as a war president but as a supporter of democracy who believes in freedom of reglion, of speech and of free expression as long as it is not causing death
hence .. i was not a worrier.. i was only demonstratating and defacing and de-painting the biography of a us marine... hence i m seeing this performance not as a samurai or a warrier but as a peace dancer for the arts and against war. hence i oppose war and i agree with biden,
if there is war do not engage directly do not go
if there is a figth, do not engage ... but stay firm
i am a dancer for love
and why my horrible face
because love has also no name but speaks JAPANESE AND ....
the market place of ideas. tweeking
elaborating on the HOLMES CASE
freely talking about talking freely
the holms descent
THE MARKET PLACE OF IDEAS ....
truth will rise to the top
in the case rainer ganahl vc rozellia madonado seixas - cv 005390-19/ny i was awarded 13k including intersts but HOW CAN I COLLECT.. HENCE THAT TIME SPENT .. TILL now february 21 2023 endless calling, running. appearanced ... but the point was ... a scam, i won and i will win in the superme court case 100719 /2022 filed on 07/21/2022 the rainer ganahl vs thomas reardon case and I will get my way in the family court case and each time i am petitioner or the plaintif and the other part is the respondent and now ... should i know have the case number in my mind... well.. here it is .. i have a right to have my justice administered correctly .
and the dream i had last night was a crime.. in act that dream was this afternoon.. a long nap...
about protesters who were run over by cars and that dream was a dream
but fact is .. see this image and see what s written on it
TOXIC COURT DESCIONS
TOXIC SOCIAL MEDIA
TOXIC MEDIA THINGING
TOXIC HANDING OF WOMEN
TOXIC LAW MAKING
TOXIC FINE ART THINKING
MY NAKED BODY AGAINST THE TREE OF LIES OF FAKE TRUTH
NAKED SHOWING HIS ASS AND BALLS
ON THE BLUE INK FROM CHINA
CALLED .... TALK TO ME ---
PLEASE, TEACH ME JAPANESE
JAPANESE TEACHER: TOSHIKI HAYASAKA
CURATOR KYOKO SATO
PERFORMER rainer ganahl to oppose
NUCLEAR INTERCONTINENTAL MISSILES LAUNCHES FROM KOREA
LEFT OVERS: TONS OF PAINTINGS
AND TOYS ... LIKE AN EBBI... A SNAKE
THE TODAY PERFORMANCE WAS VERY PAINFUL
IT COSTS ME 800 FOR A NEW BICYCLE
IT COST ME MY HEART
IT COST ME MY KIDS IN FAMILY COURTS
IT COST ME
IT COST ME MY HONOR
IT SAVED MY REPUTATION AS AN ARTIST
WHO LOVES CHILDREN
AND IT PROTECTS ME FROM THE INTIMIDATIONS OF THE TENTACLES OF A META BILLIONAIRE WITH WHOM I AM IN NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT
CASE NUMBER 100719/2022
DELIBERATION TAKES TIME
FREEDOM OF SPEECH HAS A PRICE
LOVE IS SUPER COSTLY
BUT YOU CANNOT NOT TRASH A PERSON I AM SUPER FAMILIAR AND NOT GIVE HER SHIT
THIS IS A PERFORANCE I CONSIDER ANAL AND GANAL AND GANAHL
IDEA AND EXECUTION AND PHOTOGRAPHY RAINER GANAHL
RELATED VIDEOS EXIST
Facts of the case In 1918, the United States participated in a military operation on Russian soil against Germany after the Russian Revolution overthrew the tsarist regime. Russian immigrants in the US circulated literature calling for a general strike in ammunition plants to undermine the US war effort. The defendants were convicted for two leaflets thrown from a New York City window. One denounced the sending of American troops to Russia, and the second denounced the war and advocated for the cessation of the production of weapons to be used against "Workers Soviets of Russia". They were sentenced to 20 years in prison. Question Do the amendments to the Espionage Act or the application of those amendments in this case violate the free speech clause of the First Amendment?
7–2 DECISION FOR UNITED STATES MAJORITY OPINION BY JOHN H. CLARKE The convictions under the Espionage Act satisfied the "clear and present danger" test.
The Court held that in calling for a general strike and the curtailment of munitions production, the leaflets violated the Espionage Act. Congress’ determination that all such propaganda posed a danger to the war effort was sufficient to meet the standard set in Schenck v. United States for prosecuting attempted crimes. As in Schenck, the Court emphasized that protections on speech are lower during wartime. In a dissenting opinion, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes argued that the First Amendment protects the right to dissent from the government’s viewpoints and objectives. Protections on speech, he continued, should not be curtailed unless there is a present danger of immediate evil, or the defendant intends to create such a danger. The evidence in this case consisted of two leaflets, which he concluded did not meet the “clear and present danger” test.
i am a "old clam man" destitute because not yet throught the court system.. not yet through all my cases and on top .. all these war cases
I care and i love
I wanna get my right to be a father
hence i suffer because i am in love with my children that were withheld from me based on a lie